MONARC INTELLIGENCE
--
Days to EU AI Transparency Enforcement Dec 2, 2026 · EU AI Omnibus · May 7, 2026
Aug 2025
GPAI Governance Obligations · Already Active Law EU AI Act Art. 3 · In Force
€35M
Max penalty or 7% global revenue EU AI Act Art. 99
35.7%
Managers feel prepared for AI governance Prefactor · Mar 2026
$492M
Enterprise AI governance spend 2026 Gartner · Feb 2026
63%
AI breach orgs had no governance policy Prefactor · Mar 2026
50%
AI agent deployments fail by 2030 Gartner · Mar 2026
34%
CAGR AI governance market 2026–2035 Precedence Research · Apr 2026
$5.9B
AI governance market by 2035 Precedence Research · Apr 2026
--
Days to EU AI Transparency Enforcement Dec 2, 2026 · EU AI Omnibus · May 7, 2026
€35M
Max penalty or 7% global revenue EU AI Act Art. 99
Aug 2025
GPAI Governance Obligations · Already Active Law EU AI Act Art. 3 · In Force
35.7%
Managers feel prepared for AI governance Prefactor · Mar 2026
$492M
Enterprise AI governance spend 2026 Gartner · Feb 2026
63%
AI breach orgs had no governance policy Prefactor · Mar 2026
50%
AI agent deployments fail by 2030 Gartner · Mar 2026
34%
CAGR AI governance market 2026–2035 Precedence Research · Apr 2026
$5.9B
AI governance market by 2035 Precedence Research · Apr 2026
The Entry Point

Before you can architect AI decisions, you need
to understand them.

  • Built for CCO · CLO · CRO · Chief AI Officer
  • Institutional Score · 0–100, delivered live
  • 90-minute live debrief with the Monarc Principal Architect
  • EU AI Act enforcement: 176 days · December 2, 2026
Starting at $20,000 · 90-min live debrief · Architecture brief included

A structural picture of your decision layer — as it operates, not as you believe it does.

The gap between the two compounds. The Assessment is where you close it.

01The Assessment

What it
reveals.

The Assessment is a structured investigation of your Decision Infrastructure — conducted with your leadership team and scored into a single Institutional Score. It is not a benchmark and not a survey. It is a structural read of how your organization actually makes, owns, and defends its consequential decisions. What follows are representative of the questions a complete finding resolves — not the assessment itself. The instrument that produces the Institutional Score is proprietary and principal-led.

Where your decision authority is documented — and where it is only assumed.
A clear read on which consequential decisions have owned, defensible authority behind them, and which would not survive a regulator, board, or acquirer asking who decided and on what basis.
Where institutional reasoning is retained — and where it walks out the door.
Whether the intelligence behind your consequential choices is preserved as an institutional asset, or lost when the people who hold it leave.
Where your decision-making carries structural friction.
A map of where decisions slow, stall, or reverse under organizational pressure — and the structural conditions producing those outcomes before they reach the board.
Where your exposure is concentrated — and what to stabilize first.
A single Institutional Score, the structural risks behind it, and a prioritized 90-day plan for closing the gaps that matter most.
These questions are illustrative only — representative of what a finding resolves, not the assessment itself. The full assessment, the scoring system, and the structural determinations behind your finding are proprietary to Monarc and delivered by the Principal Architect. They cannot be reproduced from a question list.
02Sample Output

This is what your
organization receives.

Scored, mapped, and delivered live — the complete deliverable set, rendered as your leadership team receives it.

Your organization
0/48
✓ Applied
Sample output · the finding is yours
Pricing confirmed at discovery
Scope confirmed at discovery
90-min debrief
Architect Decisions. Engineer Outcomes.™
03What You Receive

Five deliverables.
One architecture path.

Every Assessment produces a structured deliverable set — institutional-grade output giving leadership an unambiguous picture of where your Decision Infrastructure stands and what it costs to leave gaps open.

D-01
Institutional Score
Decision Health
Your 0–100 score with dimension breakdowns and band classification — the number your board references when evaluating your decision layer.
Includes Risk Flag assessment
D-02
Decision
Friction Map
A structural map of where decisions stall, where authority is ambiguous, and where the absence of Decision Infrastructure generates compounding risk.
Mapped to your organization
D-03
Top 5 Structural
Risks
Your five highest-priority gaps ranked by institutional exposure — regulatory, reputational, and operational — with the remediation architecture for each.
Ranked by institutional exposure
D-04
90-Day Stabilization
Plan
A sequenced stabilization plan for your most critical architecture gaps, paired with a full architecture brief — the document that replaces months of internal planning.
Scoped per engagement
All five deliverables delivered in a 90-minute live debrief with the Principal Architect.
01
Output: Scored Assessment Set
The Assessment
The Monarc Principal Architect conducts a structured assessment session with your leadership team. No preparation required — the assessment is designed to surface what is there, not what has been prepared.
02
Output: Institutional Score · Friction Map · Risk Report
The Analysis
Responses are scored against the institutional framework. The structural risk evaluation system assesses signals throughout. The Decision Friction Map is built from the structural data before the debrief.
03
Output: 90-Day Plan · Architecture Brief · Next Steps
The Debrief
A 90-minute structured debrief delivers your Institutional Score, walks through the Decision Friction Map and Top 5 Risk Report, and presents your 90-day stabilization plan and architecture brief. Every finding explained. Next steps confirmed.
Engagement scope defined per client during discovery · No template engagements
04The Process

Three steps.
One clear
verdict.

The Assessment protocol is built for executives who cannot afford months on an internal assessment that produces a findings memo no one acts on. Every step produces a specific output. No discovery sprints. No alignment workshops. No deliverable drift.

What you receive at the end is a complete assessment — not a starting point for a longer conversation. The architecture brief inside every Assessment is the bridge from assessment to action.

The Forcing Function

The architecture gap just
became a legal obligation.

On December 2, 2026, the enforcement mechanism becomes explicit and the penalties become quantified. For organizations deploying AI without a documented decision authority record, the exposure is not theoretical — it is the standard already applied in analog precedent, now extended to every AI-influenced decision.

176
Days to enforcement
EU AI Office · Dec 2, 2026
€35M
Maximum penalty, or 7% of global revenue
EU AI Act · Art. 99
72h
Window to produce a decision authority record on inquiry
Regulatory response standard
63%
Of AI-breach organizations had no governing policy
Prefactor · Mar 2026
Assess Your Exposure → Priority scheduling for organizations with active EU AI Act exposure
05The Engagement

Priced to clear the room
that approves it.

Calibrated to the approval threshold below which most regulated-industry organizations move without a formal procurement process. It does not require a board vote. It requires a decision.

$20,000
Starting price · The Assessment
Institutional Score · Decision Health (0–100)
Decision Friction Map · Mapped to your structure
Top 5 Structural Risk Report · Risk-ranked
90-Day Stabilization Plan + Architecture Brief
90-minute live debrief · Monarc Principal Architect
Credit
100% of the engagement fee is credited toward any subsequent Monarc engagement.
CCOCLOCRO Chief AI OfficerPE-BackedEU AI Act Exposure

You are not paying for a report. You are funding the first layer of a permanent institutional system — built where the cost of the architecture gap is already accumulating.

06Begin Your Assessment

Request your Assessment.

Delivered personally by the Monarc Principal Architect · Board-grade output standard · Response within 72 hours
Mutual NDA standard on every engagement
72h
Response Time
Every assessment request receives a response within 72 hours. Priority scheduling for organizations with active EU AI Act exposure.
90
Minute Live Debrief
The Monarc Principal Architect walks through every deliverable in a 90-minute structured session. No recorded video. No async deck. A live architectural conversation.
100%
Fee Credited Forward
The full Assessment engagement fee is credited toward any subsequent Monarc Decision Architecture engagement. The assessment is the first investment in the architecture.
NDA
Standard on Every Engagement
A mutual NDA is standard on every Monarc engagement — not an add-on or a request. All engagement materials are treated as confidential from first contact.
The Monarc Standard
Every Assessment engagement delivers the complete set — Institutional Score, Decision Friction Map, Structural Risk Report, and 90-day Stabilization Plan — walked through in a live debrief with the Monarc Principal Architect. Not a summary presentation. Not a findings memo. The full deliverable set is committed in writing in your engagement scope before work begins.
What Happens Next

Your request is in.
Here is the sequence.

MPA Response
You receive a direct response within 72 hours. Organizations with active EU AI Act exposure are prioritized for scheduling.
Within 72 hours
The Assessment
A structured assessment session with your leadership team. No preparation required — it is designed to surface what is there, not what has been rehearsed.
Structured session
The Debrief
A 90-minute live debrief delivers your Institutional Score, Friction Map, Top 5 Risk Report, and 90-day stabilization plan — rendered on screen in real time.
90-minute live debrief
Delivered personally by the Monarc Principal Architect
Institutional-grade documentation
Board-grade output standard
Mutual NDA standard on every engagement